Chapter 96
Revenge and vengeance: the urge to repay injury, blood feud and retaliation; whether vengeance is just, divine or forbidden.
841 passages · 327 principal · Covers the 49 volumes of primary texts
Revenge is the urge to repay injury with injury. It covers the private quarrel and the blood feud, the duel of honour and the reprisal between nations, and the vengeance that men assign to God or the gods. It is a great idea for these books because nearly every serious question about justice passes through it. One question is whether the wish to strike back is natural or learned. Another is whether repaying evil can ever be just. A third is how a community stops the chain of killing that private retaliation begins, and a fourth is whether a righteous God may himself be called vengeful. Epic, tragedy and romance supply the material. The philosophers, the moralists and the theologians argue over its meaning.
The first question is where the passion comes from. Augustine finds it in the cradle. As a thwarted infant, he says, he “avenged myself on them by tears” upon his elders1. Hume treats revenge, with avarice and ambition, as so universal that a people without it would be an incredible tale2. Locke sees the impulse in children but blames parents who cultivate it by teaching a child to strike back3,4. Rousseau gives the sharpest dissent. Natural man, he holds, retaliated only mechanically, like a dog biting a thrown stone, and regarded injury as something to be repaired rather than punished5. Only when esteem arose did injuries become affronts, and only then did revenge become terrible and bloody, a product of society6. Shelley likewise calls revenge “the naked idol of the worship of a semi-barbarous age”7. Hume adds a point about what vengeance is aimed at: it can rightly fall only on a lasting person whose character produced the act, so that without necessity no one would be a fit object of it8.
Whatever its origin, the passion is described everywhere as sweet and overpowering. Bacon counts it among the passions that master the fear of death, observing that “Revenge triumphs over death”9. Dante defines wrath as love perverted: the man who feels insulted thirsts for vengeance and delights in another’s harm10. Shelley’s Cenci ranks the groans of a slain foe above lust as his keenest pleasure11. Hobbes, more clinically, warns that a habitual desire of revenge becomes rage, a form of madness12. The moralists list it plainly among the vices13,14,15. Woolman traces a progression from pride through malice to revenge16.
The writers also agree, with striking unanimity, that vengeance recoils on the one who takes it. Aesop’s horse gains his revenge on the stag and loses his freedom in the bargain17. Bacon notes that private revenge harms the avenger18. Milton’s Satan admits that revenge, sweet at first, recoils bitterly19, and God foresees it falling back on his rebellious head20. In Schiller, Fürst condemns revenge as fruitless and self-devouring, ending in despair21. Byron’s Nemesis makes men repent their own revenges22.
From such observations comes the case against revenge. Socrates in the Crito holds that one must never return evil for evil, whatever the many believe23. Marcus Aurelius gives the Stoic form of the idea: the best way to avenge oneself is not to become like the wrongdoer24. Long, his commentator, explains that resentment may be natural but revenge must not be practised, and he joins Socrates to Paul and Christ25. Epictetus offers examples. Pittacus frees an offender, saying forgiveness shows gentleness and revenge savagery26, and Lycurgus reforms the youth who blinded him27. Browne holds that no revenge equals contempt of an injury28. The Christian writers turn the maxim into a command. Molière’s Cleante urges that a Christian must stifle every wish for vengeance29. Calderón’s Clotaldo tells Segismund to pardon enemies as Christian law bids30. Penn insists that the one who forgives first wins31, and Manzoni’s Fra Cristoforo, confessing the murder he once committed in hatred, teaches that only true forgiveness sets a man free32. Shakespeare’s Prospero finds the rarer action in virtue rather than vengeance33. Aristides declines to triumph over the fallen Themistocles34.
Some authors offer nobler substitutes instead of outright renunciation. Bacon advises telling oneself that the hour for revenge has not yet come35. Cellini’s father turns his son’s anger toward art as the best vengeance36, and Cellini later pours his fury against Bandinello into the Perseus37. Dryden finds a poetical revenge in Virgil’s treatment of the men who displeased him, on the principle that “the vengeance we defer is not forgotten”38. Cellini also admits that a more “singular” revenge of humiliation was a mistake39.
Against all this stands the oldest view, that vengeance is a duty of honour. Plato’s Socrates himself cites Achilles, who scorned death to avenge Patroclus and feared dishonour more than dying40. Sophocles’ Creon says men raise sons to repay their father’s foes41. In the Odyssey, Eupeithes calls failure to avenge slain sons a lasting shame42. Beowulf declares it better to avenge a friend than to mourn him fruitlessly43. The Volsung saga makes vengeance for a father the very test of a hero44,45. Renaissance and modern figures inherit the code. Cellini carves an axe on his brother’s tomb so that he will not forget his revenge46. Malcolm bids Macduff make medicine of great revenge47. Chivalry widens the duty to the wronged in general: Renan sees the noblest use of strength in succouring and avenging weakness48. Cervantes makes comedy of the ideal. Don Quixote proclaims it his office to revenge the wronged49, while Andrew, whom he has “avenged,” would rather have money for his journey than all the revenges in the world50. The family name has its own logic. Browning’s dying Tresham holds that blood must wash out the blot on his house, yet with his last breath warns that vengeance is God’s51.
The duty of avenging kin produces the blood feud, and here Aeschylus is the great witness. In the house of Atreus, blood once shed becomes the seed of more52. Clytemnestra justifies her husband’s murder as requital for Iphigenia53. Orestes kills his mother at Apollo’s command54, and the Furies, avengers of a mother’s blood, refuse to relent55,56. The Norse cycle is as relentless. Gudrun serves Atli his sons’ hearts and burns his hall57, then whets her other sons to a fresh vengeance for Swanhild58. Beowulf foresees the Heathobard feud reviving when an old warrior goads a youth by pointing to an heirloom sword59. Brynhild counsels killing the son lest a young wolf be nourished60.
The ancient remedies are judgment, compensation and covenant. Athena founds a court and persuades the Furies to bless the city against civil bloodshed61,62. Zeus ends Odysseus’ feud with oblivion and a covenant63. Hrothgar settles Ecgtheow’s feud with treasure64. Grendel’s monstrousness shows precisely in his refusal to compound for gold65, and Gudrun likewise spurns atonement66. A modern treaty forbids private retaliation and directs complaint to the authorities67. Manzoni’s Cardinal Federigo suppresses ancient feuds, though suppression, Manzoni notes, was commoner than true reconciliation68.
Whether descendants inherit the debt is debated. Raleigh sees God avenging Edward II’s murder down the generations69. Calvin speaks of vengeance on the third and fourth generation70. Job, by contrast, rejects the idea that the children bear the wicked man’s punishment71. Burke and Freeman deny it most strongly. Burke condemns punishing men for their ancestors’ offences72 and argues that history should teach posterity not to retaliate on later generations73. Freeman mocks the notion of Barbarossa avenging Crassus on Saladin74.
The modern discussion turns on law. Bacon calls revenge “wild justice” that law ought to weed out, tolerable only where law gives no remedy18. Rousseau recalls that before laws each man was judge and avenger of his own injuries75. The Koran prescribes the talion while counting remission of it an expiation76. Hobbes makes the key distinction: natural law permits punishment only for future good, and vengeance aimed at the past is vain cruelty77. Cicero claims that his severity was deterrence, not revenge78. Locke says a parent who punishes in choler cannot amend the child79. Burke asks that justice even against tyrants be grave and decorous80. More observes that crimes are punished as revenged rather than prevented81.
The hard case is the wronged person whom law cannot help. Shelley’s Beatrice finds no law to vindicate her82 and calls her father’s murder God’s angel of wrath83. Shelley’s preface nevertheless calls revenge and atonement pernicious mistakes84. Schiller’s Tell distinguishes his deed, a father’s defence that avenged nature itself, from a parricide’s ambitious murder85. Ganelon’s plea that he wrought vengeance, not treason, shows how the same claim may serve a traitor86.
Revenge also moves parties and nations. Machiavelli warns that injuries must be crushing enough to leave no fear of reprisal87, and that conquered republics nurse the keenest thirst for revenge88. Burke sees the Roman proscriptions as reciprocated retaliations of blood89. Washington calls the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension and a road to despotism90. He also says that national animosity leads to insult, retaliation and war91. Coriolanus turns his exile into war on Rome92 until Volumnia’s plea prevails93. Adam Smith finds revenge dictating tariff retaliation, sensible only if it forces repeal94,95. More’s Utopians avenge their friends but refuse to revenge small losses with many deaths96. The voyagers record the same motive at the edges of the known world. Drake restrains Cimaroons bent on cutting Spanish throats97. Vespucci reports native wars waged to avenge kinsmen98, and Darwin notes that among the Maori blows must be returned99.
Divine vengeance both checks the human kind and sanctions it. The psalmist invokes the God to whom vengeance belongs100. Augustine calls human anger a perverse imitation of God, who alone revenges justly101. Malory’s Galahad tells Bors that vengeance on sinners is not theirs to take102, and Byron’s Abbot cites “Vengeance is mine alone”103. Mill turns the doctrine outward, denying that society holds a commission to avenge offences against Omnipotence104. Yet Scripture, the Koran and Dante abound in God’s retribution. The Koran calls God mighty and avenging105, and Dante grades sins by the vengeance divine justice pours on them106. Beatrice resolves the paradox of a just vengeance, the Crucifixion, that was itself justly avenged107. The pagan gods avenge slights more personally. Aphrodite vows to repay Hippolytus in full108. Virgil asks whether heavenly minds can harbour Juno’s resentment109, until Jupiter tells her that her time for wrath is over110.
Prayers for vengeance run from the psalmist’s wish to see his enemies’ blood111 to the widow of the parable112 and Milton’s sonnet on the slaughtered Piedmontese113. Burns parodies them in Holy Willie114. The moderns criticise the vengeful deity as a projection. Hobbes notes that the gentiles ascribed anger and revenge to their gods115, and Pope speaks of gods made by fear in the likeness of tyrants116. Rousseau rejects a vindictive God as contrary to reason117, and Kant sees such a will as opposed to morality118. Shelley condemns the horrible revenge of the God of popular creed119. Rousseau keeps a moral law of retribution all the same: men’s avenging passions, he says, serve as justice’s ministers here below120.
The literature gathers all these threads into character. Hamlet spares the praying king because killing him then would be “hire and salary,” not revenge121, and he scorns his own delay122. Laertes, by contrast, would cut a throat in church123. Milton’s Satan vows “study of revenge, immortal hate”124 and visits his loss on innocent Man125. Samson’s end is a “dearly bought revenge, yet glorious”126. Ferdinand, perversely, calls pardon the most honourable revenge, then tortures his sister127.
Several questions remain open across the whole tradition. One is whether resentment is natural while revenge is not. Another is whether law ends vengeance or merely disciplines it. A third is whether God’s vengeance forbids man’s or authorises it.
Introductory essay written by Claude Opus 5.5 from the outline and the notes on every passage below; quotations are checked against this edition.
See also: Family 10e · Punishment 7a
See also: Justice 9a
See also: Honor 8c
See also: Punishment 7b · Justice 9b · Fate 1b · Family 10c
See also: Courage 8c · Fate 1b · War and Peace 4b
See also: War and Peace 1b
See also: Justice 9a · Family 10c
See also: Revolution 4b
See also: Punishment 7a · War and Peace 8e
See also: God 3f
See also: Hospitality 1a · God 11b · Punishment 10c · Religion 5b
See also: Family 10e · Punishment 7a · Justice 9b · Religion 5c
See also: Angel 7b · War and Peace 1d · God 8c · Will 2a
See also: Tyranny 6a · Family 10a
See also: Chivalry 7c