Chapter 55
Law and laws: natural, divine and human law; legislation, obedience and legal institutions.
998 passages · 332 principal · Covers the 49 volumes of primary texts
Law is among the most comprehensive of the ideas treated in these books. It names the order by which the stars move and the order by which a parish must pursue a thief. It covers the commandment given at Sinai and the statute fixing the price of bread. The Harvard Classics speak of law in all these senses: eternal, natural, moral, divine and human. They are often uncertain whether these senses share anything beyond the word. The poets set divine ordinance against royal decree. The Stoics see one reason binding gods and men. Hobbes and Kant build systems on the notion of a law of nature. Scripture debates whether law saves. Political writers ask how statutes arise, why they bind, and when they fail. Novelists, economists and reformers record the courts, lawyers and proclamations through which law actually reaches people. Law is a great idea here because nearly every other question of human order, whether justice, liberty, sin or the state, passes through it.
The oldest voices in the collection treat law as something prior to any human lawgiver. In Aeschylus the Furies claim their office as a fixed ordinance of Fate that even the gods cannot annul1. Zeus’s law demands that the doer suffer2. Euripides praises “the Law that abides and changes not,” eternal and born of nature, against which striving is vain3. Sophocles’ chorus invokes laws born of heaven that forgetfulness never overwhelms4. The Stoics turn this reverence into a doctrine. Cleanthes calls men to wise obedience to God’s universal Law5. Epictetus says it is God’s edicts, not those of the jurists, that a man must interpret and obey6. Marcus Aurelius reasons that a common reason entails a common law, so that all rational beings are fellow citizens of one city7,8,9. On this view whoever grieves or rages at what the ruler of all appoints is a runaway from the law10. Augustine carries the idea into Christian terms. Theft is punished both by God’s Law and by a law written in the heart11. God’s eternal law never permits what custom excuses12, and that law is one and unchanging even when its precepts vary with the times13.
The moderns divide this inheritance. Emerson keeps the moral half and makes it impersonal. The moral law executes itself and works without means14. It is as reliable as gravity15. Through compensation it even writes the laws of cities, so that cruel governments and bloody codes defeat themselves16. The physical half becomes the laws of science. Helmholtz speaks of natural phenomena conforming to simply statable laws that permit prediction17. Berkeley calls such laws the rules by which God presents things to our view18. Hume holds them established by unalterable experience, so that a miracle would violate them19. Tennyson’s poem keeps the question open: is God law, or is law God20?
Between cosmic law and civil statute stands the law of nature as a measure for peoples. Winthrop distinguishes moral laws grounded in God’s Word and in nature from positive statutes that need set penalties21. He holds that law is natural to man while penalty is accidental22. The Declaration of Independence appeals to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”23. Rousseau, by contrast, finds that natural law survived among men only as the law of nations governing relations between societies24. Pascal is more severe. Natural laws are claimed to be universal, but human caprice has left none standing, and reason, once corrupted, has burdened us with laws as it once did with vices25.
Hobbes reconstructs natural law on a new footing. Where there is no common power there is no law, and where there is no law there is no injustice. Reason only suggests articles of peace, which he calls Laws of Nature26. Such a law is a rule found by reason forbidding what is destructive of one’s life. Hobbes sharply separates it from right, which is liberty27. From the first law, to seek peace, he derives the laying down of right28 and the performance of covenants29, which is justice itself30. Gratitude, pardon, the acknowledgment of equality and submission to arbitrators follow31,32,33,34. All of them are summed in the golden rule35. These laws bind in conscience always but in action only where others are secure36. They are properly called laws only as the word of God, who commands by right37. Covenants of mutual trust are therefore void in the state of nature and bind only where a coercive power exists38. No covenant can surrender the right to resist force against one’s life39.
Kant rejects any law drawn from human nature or experience. The moral law must hold with absolute necessity for all rational beings40,41, and must be objective and a priori42. Everything in nature works according to laws, but only a rational being acts according to the conception of law43. Moral goodness consists in letting that conception determine the will. Hence the imperative to act only on a maxim one could will as universal law44. Hobbes’s law of nature was a counsel of self-preservation completed by a sovereign. Kant’s law is self-given yet universal45,46, and it constitutes a kingdom of ends distinct from the kingdom of nature47. Here the ancient Stoic city of reason returns, but grounded in autonomy rather than in cosmic order.
If there is a higher law, may it override a ruler’s command? Sophocles stages the question permanently. Creon’s edict forbids the burial of Polynices48. Ismene counsels obedience49. Antigone answers that the unwritten and eternal laws of the gods outweigh a mortal’s decree50. Creon holds that whoever breaks the laws deserves no praise51, but by the end he wavers toward the ancient laws52. The Christian authors repeat Antigone’s claim in their own terms. More’s Utopia denies that man’s laws can license killing that God forbids53. At his trial More argued that Parliament could not make law contrary to God’s law by making the King head of the Church54. He added that a realm can no more override the general law of the Church than London can override Parliament55. Luther turns the same principle against the Church itself. Papal law has no authority against God’s command56. Canon laws are money-snares sold for gain57, and the whole should be abolished because Scripture suffices58.
Emerson and Thoreau carry the appeal inward, from God’s command to the self. For the self-reliant man no law is sacred but that of his own nature59. He must be law to himself60. The just man shows human legislation to be pitiful61. Thoreau calls the search for a law to obey servile62. Cellini offers the darker version: the Pope declares unique artists above the law63. Pascal notes that those who renounce God’s laws invent stricter ones for themselves64.
Scripture treats law as revelation and as a test. The Psalms delight in it. The law of Jehovah is perfect, restoring the soul65, sweeter than honey and a lamp to the feet66, and it brings a walking at liberty67. The Koran likewise sets out God’s bounds on inheritance, food and marriage, with gardens for the obedient and fire for transgressors68,69. It condemns those who do not judge by what God revealed70. Paul, however, contrasts the letter engraved on stone, which ministers death, with the spirit that gives life71. Acts records that justification comes through Christ and not the law of Moses72, and it records the council’s decision to lay on Gentiles only a few necessary abstentions73,74. Luther develops the point: the precepts show what we ought to do but give no power to do it75, so the believer is free from the law76. Bunyan’s Law revives the very sin it forbids77, and his Moses knows no mercy78. Milton’s angel calls law a discipline leading to a covenant of grace79. Pascal sums it up: law imposed what it did not give, while grace gives what it imposes80. Yet Pascal also praises the Mosaic law as the oldest and most perfect, borrowed by Greek and Roman legislators81. In Luke, Jesus asks whether it is lawful on the sabbath to save life82. That question sets mercy against rule in a way that recurs later in the equity of judges.
Human law raises the questions of origin and authority. Some authors credit the single founder. Descartes judges that laws designed by one wise legislator surpass laws that evolved piecemeal, as Sparta’s did83. Bacon calls lawgivers second founders84, and his Solamona legislates for a whole society85. Voltaire admires Penn’s unchanged laws86. Machiavelli grounds states on good laws and good arms, adding that laws follow from arms87. Others ground law in consent. Winthrop holds that implicit consent binds outward obedience but cannot make an unjust law just88. Emerson calls law a mere memorandum of agreement, with force only as living character supplies it89. Burke, opposing the revolutionaries, roots law in prescription. Jurisprudence is the collected reason of ages90, and prescription mellows violent beginnings into legality91. Goethe’s Mephistopheles mocks exactly this, calling inherited laws a hereditary disease92. Pascal’s position is the most unsettling. Laws are obeyed because they are laws, not because they are just93. Their origin must be concealed lest they end94, and the people must be told to obey them as laws95. Burke answers in part that laws resting only on terror lack the affections and manners that support them96.
Obedience receives its classic defense in the Crito. The personified Laws argue that no state can survive if individuals set aside its judgments97. Disobedience wrongs one’s parents, educators and covenants98, all freely accepted over seventy years99. Descartes and Montaigne adopt the maxim of obeying the laws of one’s country100,101. Lincoln advises obeying unrepealed acts rather than gambling on their unconstitutionality102. Defoe, ironically, turns the same appeal to known laws into an argument for persecution103. The modern counter-question concerns liberty. Milton holds that the art of law lies in discerning where restraint is needed and where persuasion suffices104. Smith says law’s proper business is to support natural liberty, restrained only for public security105. Mill attacks laws that penalize opinion106 and laws that prohibit innocent things in order to reach what the public thinks wrong107.
The fate of positive legislation runs through many of these books. Confucius warns that rule by law and punishment makes men avoid crime but lose their sense of shame108. More’s Utopians keep few, plain laws109. Luther calls the civil law a wilderness110. Winthrop insists laws be made known to all111. Dante scorns Florence’s ever-renewed statutes112. Manzoni gives the fullest portrait of law’s impotence. Governor after governor reissues near-identical edicts against bravoes113,114. These proclamations are mere paper against the privileged115, and Renzo concludes that they never send an oppressor to the galleys116. Harrison records an Elizabethan law requiring flax-sowing that was contemptuously ignored117, and lawmakers who break their own laws118. Smith adds that statutes cannot override economic tendency. Law can never properly regulate wages119, and no law can push interest below the market rate120. Revenue laws make a crime of what nature never meant to be criminal121. Sydney Smith, for his part, ridicules irrevocable laws as binding the living to the dead122,123. Trajan had already refused to give new rules retrospective force124.
Some authors go further and see law as the instrument of the powerful. More describes rich men’s devices becoming laws125. Rousseau shows inequality made permanent and lawful through property126. Smith notes that the law permits masters’ combinations but forbids workmen’s127. Penn observes that the greatest injustice passes under the name of law128. To Webster’s Ferdinand and Massinger’s Overreach, laws are cobwebs129,130.
Courts and judges are where law meets cases. Athena’s founding of the Areopagus replaces vengeance with a lasting tribunal131,132. The Furies fear that acquittal will overthrow the ancient laws133. Socrates reminds his judges that they have sworn to judge by the laws, not by their own pleasure134. Bacon defines the judge’s office as declaring law, not making it135, but he would soften outdated penal laws in their execution136. More defends injunctions as relief from the rigour of the law137. Pliny prefers a testator’s evident intent to legal form138. Winthrop leaves penalties to the judge case by case139, while the Body of Liberties forbids touching life or goods except by express law140. The satire of lawyers runs from Luke141 through Hamlet’s quiddits142 to Manzoni’s pliable doctor143. Mill records Bentham’s exposure of English law’s vices144,145. Marshall’s opinion shows a constitution acting as supreme law over the states146,147.
The texts leave several questions unresolved. They do not settle whether law is fundamentally reason, as the Stoics and Kant hold, or command backed by power, as Hobbes and Pascal suggest. Nor do they settle whether conscience may set a higher law against the statute, or whether reverence for law is a useful fiction or a recognition of something real. From Antigone to the Fugitive Slave Act148, these books show that the tension between law and justice remains open.
Introductory essay written by Claude Opus 5.5 from the outline and the notes on every passage below; quotations are checked against this edition.
See also: The Sublime 5a · Punishment 1b · Religion 1b · Justice 10c
See also: War and Peace 10a
See also: Duty 9a
See also: Will 1b · Duty 1a · Philosophy 5c
See also: Will 5 · Duty 1a · Principle 3
See also: Tyranny 5a
See also: Tyranny 7a · Family 2c · Liberty 3b · Religion 12b
See also: Race and Nationality 7a
See also: Theology 6a · Liberty 3a · Sin 9c
See also: Custom and Convention 5a · Revolution 7a · Wealth 8c · Tyranny 8b
See also: Justice 2b
See also: Liberty 6c
See also: Government 6e · Punishment 3c
See also: Labor 7d · Liberty 8b · Wealth 10d
See also: Judgment 7a · Punishment 3b · Justice 6a
See also: Theology 1a
See also: Justice 7c · Slavery 7c · Liberty 7e
See also: Government 7c · Constitution 6c · Taxation 2b · Reasoning 5c
See also: Justice, Government, Punishment, Liberty, Constitution, Tyranny